Skip to content

Auction bug? How can this be explained? #40

@hacashaddcit

Description

@hacashaddcit

Why did diamond 123654 (HTYZII) go to 188cajxnQVmZFpB59uA4PqrJ4nvV1mCyMZ who bid only 8 HAC, when it looks like it should have gone to 1DkWCLou2oVVAKnsMvWQn9xc5weao2USwS who bid 30 HAC?

1DkWCLou2oVVAKnsMvWQn9xc5weao2USwS mined diamond YWSHAV at block 716136 (well before the auction was finalized), and the node acknowledged that this address was the highest bidder, bidding 30 HAC (screenshot below). While 188cajxnQVmZFpB59uA4PqrJ4nvV1mCyMZ bid only 8 HAC and won the auction with diamond HTYZII.

@jojoin

Image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions