-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 152
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Database column defaults are not replacing empty string or nil values #517
Comments
|
Can you handle the default values at the model layer instead? A "Custom schema" might get you what you want. Semantically, the city is Honestly, I'd probably go higher than the model and handle this in a I know this might not be the answer you want, and there might be some underlying issue here that we need to fix, it just seems like there's a better way to accomplish what you're trying to do. (Maybe this DB interacts with another app and that's why you have to do it this way, I don't know.) |
I guess a work-around would be to convert the entity into a hash and compact it. Then all keys where the value is nil would be removed (empty strings would still be around though!) and defaults of the database should be filled in. A better approach would be to have defaults specified in the entity. In that case one needs to create a custom schema... @cllns Couldn't the auto-discovery of the schema also consider defaults? |
If the column allows Same goes with the empty string. @whysthatso You can probably properly handle these with a validator either on the Action or Interactor level. |
When invoking
ObjectRepository.new.create
, a new Object is indeed persisted with the default values as defined in the migration.When invoking `ObjectRepository.new.create( Object.new( attribute1: '', attribute2:'foobar', attribute3:nil )
an Object with all these attributes set is persisted, but neither empty string nor nil is set to the default value.
Possibly unimportant context:
The attribute values are received from a form object that is handled inside an interactor.
The model is part of an
has_one
association: ThisObject.has_one OtherObject.Any more info needed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: