WASM and "unsafe" languages #1415
                  
                    
                      DerpMcDerp
                    
                  
                
                  started this conversation in
                Suggestions
              
            Replies: 0 comments
  
    Sign up for free
    to join this conversation on GitHub.
    Already have an account?
    Sign in to comment
  
        
    
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
There have been 2 trends over the past few years:
If you're targeting WASM, then "safe" languages just adds overhead on top of the overhead of the sandbox. So C++ can counter the "safe" language propaganda by promoting WASM as a target and saying C++'s value add is that it doesn't add additional overhead on top of the sandbox's overhead.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions