Skip to content

One of the variables needed for gradient computation has been modified by an inplace operation #759

Answered by rwightman
pgsrv asked this question in General
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

@pgsrv yes, it's perfectly okay to change inplace to False there... it doesn't appear to be a problem in normal classification use with no mods to the network, so I assume you've either modified the network from defaults, or a using it in a different task with additional stems, heads, or taps... ?

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@pgsrv
Comment options

Answer selected by pgsrv
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants