-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Have options for shorthand syntax #10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
👍 |
I don't think we need to add this to the spec. Also for millions of items you'd probably go with some + efficient binary format |
I agree, this should not be part of the spec. Both network traffic and database values could be compressed (e.g. HTTP |
Yes, such optimizations are at the wrong layer. No need to complicate the patch format to optimize here. Because it is not just about keys, but also about values, they can also be duplicated many times. Compression solves all those problems at once. Many transport formats and databases support compression. |
Full words create needless storage or network traffic, if I had to send thousands of patches through a network connection, or store millions of them in a database I'm wasting allot of bytes needlessly.
So having the ability to have shortened operators and keys would be beneficial something like:
replace = rp
remove = rm
copy = cp
move = mv
path = pth
value = val
etc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: