Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ignoreDaemonSets is not working #3530

Open
Duranna66 opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 10 comments
Open

ignoreDaemonSets is not working #3530

Duranna66 opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 10 comments
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Comments

@Duranna66
Copy link

Duranna66 commented Jul 2, 2024

Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.

Client Version
e.g. 19.0.0

Kubernetes Version
e.g. 1.19.3

Java Version
e.g. Java 17

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Kubectl.drain()
.ignoreDaemonSets()
.force()
.name("nodeExample")
.execute();

Expected behavior
while drain daemonSets pods starts delete .

KubeConfig
exmaple:
clusters:
- cluster:
certificate-authority-data: example
server: "exmaple"
name: exmaple
contexts:
- context:
cluster: exmaple
namespace: aclever-users
user: users.tech-user-test
name: exmaple-tech-user-test
current-context: exmaple
kind: Config
preferences: { }
users:
- name: users.tech-user-test
user:
privateKey:
token: "shifr".

Server (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. Linux]
  • Environment [e.g. container]

Additional context

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Can you provide more details about what you expect and what you are seeing?

@Duranna66
Copy link
Author

Duranna66 commented Jul 3, 2024

Can you provide more details about what you expect and what you are seeing?

I expect that pods who controlled by DaemonSet will be not delete when I do drain, but it is not.
Example: "kind":"Status","apiVersion":"v1","metadata":{},"status":"Failure","message":"pods "calico-node-pbzsr" is forbidden: User "system:serviceaccount:exmaple:users.tech-user-test" cannot delete resource "pods" in API group "" in the namespace "calico-system"","reason":"Forbidden","details":{"name":"calico-node-pbzsr","kind":"pods"},"code":403}
image

why k8s client tries to delete this ?
thx for fb

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

This is how we check for membership in the DaemonSet:

https://github.com/kubernetes-client/java/blob/master/extended/src/main/java/io/kubernetes/client/extended/kubectl/KubectlDrain.java#L76

Specifically looking for an owner reference with kind DaemonSet.

Can you share the YAML for that calico pod (kubectl get pod -o yaml ...) so that we can see what the reference is set to?

@Duranna66
Copy link
Author

This is how we check for membership in the DaemonSet:

https://github.com/kubernetes-client/java/blob/master/extended/src/main/java/io/kubernetes/client/extended/kubectl/KubectlDrain.java#L76

Specifically looking for an owner reference with kind DaemonSet.

Can you share the YAML for that calico pod (kubectl get pod -o yaml ...) so that we can see what the reference is set to?

ownerReferences:

  • apiVersion: apps/v1
    blockOwnerDeletion: true
    controller: true
    kind: DaemonSet
    name: calico-node

@Duranna66
Copy link
Author

Duranna66 commented Jul 3, 2024

Okey, let's check this code from your link

for (V1Pod pod : allPods.getItems()) {
// at this point we know, that we have to ignore daemon set pods
if (pod.getMetadata().getOwnerReferences() != null) {
for (V1OwnerReference ref : pod.getMetadata().getOwnerReferences()) {
if (ref.getKind().equals("DaemonSet")) {
continue;
}
}
}
deletePod(api, pod.getMetadata().getName(), pod.getMetadata().getNamespace());
}
return node;

 If we had DaemonSet we anyway delete this pod because continue works on second for

@Duranna66
Copy link
Author

maybe try this one

boolean isDaemonSetPod;
for (V1Pod pod : allPods.getItems()) {
// at this point we know, that we have to ignore daemon set pods
isDaemonSetPod = false;
if (pod.getMetadata().getOwnerReferences() != null) {
for (V1OwnerReference ref : pod.getMetadata().getOwnerReferences()) {
if (ref.getKind().equals("DaemonSet")) {
isDaemonSetPod = true;
break;
}
}
}
if (!isDaemonSetPod) {
deletePod(api, pod.getMetadata().getName(), pod.getMetadata().getNamespace());
}

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

We'd be happy to take a PR with any improvements to that code.

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Oh, I see you sent #3537 thank you! I will review it.

callingmahendra added a commit to callingmahendra/java that referenced this issue Jul 21, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 6, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants