Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gauge for FilesystemIsReadOnly not downgraded to 0 after fixing the problem #474

Open
sharonosbourne opened this issue Oct 8, 2020 · 14 comments

Comments

@sharonosbourne
Copy link

The problem occurred when filesystem went to read only mode. That was fixed, but still in the metrics I was able to see the counter and gauge set up to 1.
I conducted a test and multiple times injected the FileSystemIsReadOnly to the /dev/kmsg (https://github.com/kubernetes/node-problem-detector/blob/master/config/kernel-monitor.json):

1 log_monitor.go:160] New status generated: &{Source:kernel-monitor Events:[{Severity:info Timestamp:2020-10-08 06:44:16.09315274 +0000 UTC m=+1331754.148888064 Reason:FilesystemIsReadOnly Message:Node condition ReadonlyFilesystem is now: True, reason: FilesystemIsReadOnly}] Conditions:[{Type:KernelDeadlock Status:False Transition:2020-09-22 20:48:21.98500453 +0000 UTC m=+0.040739839 Reason:KernelHasNoDeadlock Message:kernel has no deadlock} {Type:ReadonlyFilesystem Status:True Transition:2020-10-08 06:44:16.09315274 +0000 UTC m=+1331754.148888064 Reason:FilesystemIsReadOnly Message:Remounting filesystem read-only}]}

Still the metrics were shown as 1 and it did not downgraded to 0. Even the the issue with ro filesystem was fixed, still the metric was 1:

problem_counter{reason="FilesystemIsReadOnly"} 1
problem_gauge{reason="FilesystemIsReadOnly",type="ReadonlyFilesystem"} 1

As a workaround the pod was deleted and after that metrics were reset to 0.
What is the reason of that behaviour? The type "permanent"? Is deleting a pod the only solution?

kernel-monitor.json

	{
		"type": "permanent",
		"condition": "ReadonlyFilesystem",
		"reason": "FilesystemIsReadOnly",
		"pattern": "Remounting filesystem read-only"
	}
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 6, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Feb 5, 2021
@adesaegher
Copy link

adesaegher commented Feb 17, 2021

We are also facing a similar issue but with many occurences as we are extensively using PVC with GCP disks.
With a ot of mounting/unmounting operations, the kernel catches many readonly disks events (not on the node root disk) and consequently node-problem-detector set the node as not ready.
We may also find a more precise pattern in kernel-monitor.json to only catch root filesystem events.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@TaichiHo
Copy link

This looks like a long standing bug that is still happening. Any suggestions here?

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Feb 15, 2024
@wangzhen127
Copy link
Member

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@wangzhen127: Reopened this issue.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Feb 26, 2024
@bsdnet
Copy link

bsdnet commented Feb 28, 2024

Are we deploying the NPD as a Linux daemon or a privileged container?

@wangzhen127
Copy link
Member

On GKE, it is deployed as linux daemon

@wangzhen127
Copy link
Member

@sharonosbourne do you remember if your issue was due to read-only filesystem in non-boot disk?

@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 30, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 29, 2024
@aslafy-z
Copy link

aslafy-z commented Jul 2, 2024

/remove-lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. label Jul 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants