You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is still a long way to the next stable release (to replace m87). Probably m14x or even m15x.
M87 was 27 skipped, 8 xfailed. M134 is likely to be similar to m133, 102 skipped, 18 xfailed. (120 not passed) . Need to get the skipped figure down to 80 or 70 at least. [1]
[1] v116b2 was 124 skipped, 15 xfailed, 16 removed. (155 not passed) . Some of the removed tests were parametric (parameters no longer works), some of the non-parametric ones were added back later, fixed, xfailed, or skipped. It took 17 months to come down from 155 to 120.
My earliest test record of a buildable m116 was 601 not passed, or only 73%, or more than 1/4 broken.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is still a long way to the next stable release (to replace m87). Probably m14x or even m15x.
M87 was 27 skipped, 8 xfailed. M134 is likely to be similar to m133, 102 skipped, 18 xfailed. (120 not passed) . Need to get the skipped figure down to 80 or 70 at least. [1]
would be nice to fix or address to some degree C++ type names appear in the docstrings #262 , regarding documentation. It is a one-off massive code re-org.
[1] v116b2 was 124 skipped, 15 xfailed, 16 removed. (155 not passed) . Some of the removed tests were parametric (parameters no longer works), some of the non-parametric ones were added back later, fixed, xfailed, or skipped. It took 17 months to come down from 155 to 120.
My earliest test record of a buildable m116 was 601 not passed, or only 73%, or more than 1/4 broken.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: