You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, that's a proposition to re-add the "PET classic" in Ladybug, alongside the corrected version proposed in https://www-sciencedirect-com.extranet.enpc.fr/science/article/pii/S0360132318301896, to allow model comparison. That implyes to fix some bugs of PET in Legacy related to the reference environment and to the way in which the human subject’s metabolic rate in met was translated into Watts above basal metabolism.
Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, that's a proposition to re-add the "PET classic" in Ladybug, alongside the corrected version proposed in https://www-sciencedirect-com.extranet.enpc.fr/science/article/pii/S0360132318301896, to allow model comparison. That implyes to fix some bugs of PET in Legacy related to the reference environment and to the way in which the human subject’s metabolic rate in met was translated into Watts above basal metabolism.
Many thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: