Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

arm64v8 image issues #49

Closed
1 task done
shandshellin opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 17 comments
Closed
1 task done

arm64v8 image issues #49

shandshellin opened this issue Feb 20, 2024 · 17 comments
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right no-issue-activity

Comments

@shandshellin
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

unable to spin up container using :latest image for arm64v8. Can someone provide a specific tage to a known working imager version for amr64?

Expected Behavior

Should determine the correct architecture automatically and grab the image.

Steps To Reproduce

  1. create service using :latest image
  2. watch it fail repeatedly

Environment

- OS: Debian
- How docker service was installed: installed in the usual way as per the docker page, works for every other arm64 image i use

CPU architecture

arm64

Docker creation

created manually in portainer not with compose.

Container logs

no logs as it doesn't spin up enough to create any logs
Copy link

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid.

@Roxedus Roxedus added the invalid This doesn't seem right label Feb 20, 2024
Copy link

A human has marked this issue as invalid, this likely happened because the issue template was not used in the creation of the issue.

@LinuxServer-CI LinuxServer-CI moved this from Issues to Insufficient Info in Issue & PR Tracker Feb 20, 2024
@shandshellin
Copy link
Author

How is it invalid if your image won't work for the advertised architecture? I see no other area to post the question. Please advise.

@Roxedus
Copy link
Member

Roxedus commented Feb 20, 2024

How can you say its failing, if you cant prove it with logs?

@j0nnymoe
Copy link
Member

Provide us logs/errors that shows the image doesn't work.

@shandshellin
Copy link
Author

no logs are created because it can't fire up the image to do so. Is there a specific tag i need to use to specify arm64 image? Seems like it is getting a non arm image.

@Roxedus
Copy link
Member

Roxedus commented Feb 20, 2024

no, there is not another tag you need to use.

@j0nnymoe
Copy link
Member

You must be getting -some- error when creating as if the image didn't work for arm64, it would error out at creation.

@shandshellin
Copy link
Author

can i specify an arm64 image for an older version? arm64v8-1.14.0 or something to force it?

@shandshellin
Copy link
Author

will this image run in non-privilaged mode? That could be party of the hangup.

@j0nnymoe
Copy link
Member

privilaged mode is required.

@Roxedus
Copy link
Member

Roxedus commented Feb 20, 2024

requires being run in privileged mode

Pulling a specific tag would not solve the root cause, which we are very interested in figuring out. What exactly happens when you run it?

@shandshellin
Copy link
Author

it's a swarm, doesn't work with privilaged containers generally. I've had other images require the specific tag because it wasn't detecting arch correctly and trying to push an x86 or the image has no arm64 support even thought it is listed for that image.

@Roxedus
Copy link
Member

Roxedus commented Feb 20, 2024

Our tags are listed on dockerhub, as well as on the package info here on github

@shandshellin
Copy link
Author

lol so were theirs. Pretty sure privilaged is the problem here, not the image. Thanks for the info.

@LinuxServer-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. This might be due to missing feedback from OP. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@Roxedus Roxedus closed this as completed Mar 22, 2024
@LinuxServer-CI LinuxServer-CI moved this from Insufficient Info to Done in Issue & PR Tracker Mar 22, 2024
Copy link

This issue is locked due to inactivity

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 22, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
invalid This doesn't seem right no-issue-activity
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants