-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reporters API #238
Comments
Ah, I'm just looking for it. Test report is important factor for DevOps. That's the evidence for what tests did and what tests didn't. |
Hey @lukeed, this is a great simple test runner, it would be great if we can have support for custom reporters. Some existing example reporters APIs: We can start with a simple API, I propose to refactor current implementation to use a basic reporter. diff --git a/src/index.js b/src/index.js
index ced88a8..c02523b 100644
--- a/src/index.js
+++ b/src/index.js
@@ -62,13 +62,26 @@ function format(name, err, suite = '') {
return str + '\n';
}
+const basicReporter = {
+ onBegin(suite) {
+ write(SUITE(kleur.black(` ${suite} `)) + ' ')
+ },
+ onTestPass(suite,test){write(PASS +`[${suite}] - ${test}`)},
+ onTestFail(suite,test,err){write(FAIL + `[${suite}] - ${test}` + '\n' + format(test, err, suite))},
+ onEnd(suite,report){
+ const {num,total,errors} = report;
+ let msg = `[${suite}] (${num} / ${total})\n`;
+ write(errors.length ? kleur.red(msg) : kleur.green(msg));
+ }
+}
+
async function runner(ctx, name) {
- let { only, tests, before, after, bEach, aEach, state } = ctx;
+ let { only, tests, before, after, bEach, aEach, state,reporter } = ctx;
let hook, test, arr = only.length ? only : tests;
let num=0, errors='', total=arr.length;
try {
- if (name) write(SUITE(kleur.black(` ${name} `)) + ' ');
+ if (name) reporter.onBegin(name);
for (hook of before) await hook(state);
for (test of arr) {
@@ -77,21 +90,20 @@ async function runner(ctx, name) {
for (hook of bEach) await hook(state);
await test.handler(state);
for (hook of aEach) await hook(state);
- write(PASS);
+ reporter.onTestPass(name, test.name)
num++;
} catch (err) {
for (hook of aEach) await hook(state);
if (errors.length) errors += '\n';
errors += format(test.name, err, name);
- write(FAIL);
+ reporter.onTestFail(name, test.name, err)
}
}
} finally {
state.__test__ = '';
for (hook of after) await hook(state);
- let msg = ` (${num} / ${total})\n`;
let skipped = (only.length ? tests.length : 0) + ctx.skips;
- write(errors.length ? kleur.red(msg) : kleur.green(msg));
+ reporter.onEnd(name, { num, total, errors, skipped });
return [errors || true, num, skipped, total];
}
}
@@ -112,8 +124,8 @@ function setup(ctx, name = '') {
test.after.each = hook(ctx, 'aEach');
test.only = into(ctx, 'only');
test.skip = () => { ctx.skips++ };
- test.run = () => {
- let copy = { ...ctx };
+ test.run = ({reporter}={reporter:basicReporter}) => {
+ let copy = { ...ctx,reporter };
let run = runner.bind(0, copy, name);
Object.assign(ctx, context(copy.state));
UVU_QUEUE[globalThis.UVU_INDEX || 0].push(run); |
Hey, @lukeed!
I'm ready to develop reporters API for
uvu
(#227) to be able to use Allure integrations with the test runner. Even outside ofallure
context, universal reporters API could be very useful for users (for example, it's possible to export test results as JSON #52 using custom report).What do you think about this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: