-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
Copy pathtldrs.html
10 lines (10 loc) · 4.65 KB
/
tldrs.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
<html>
<head>
<title>My little list of articles I've TL;DR'd</title>
</head>
<body>
<blockquote class="tldr-embed-widget" data-show-title="true" data-align="center"> <p> <a href="http://tldr.io/tldrs/51586736b34067883200003d/derrida-the-excluded-favorite-by-emily-eakin" class="link-to-tldr-page" target="_blank">Summary of "Derrida: The Excluded Favorite by Emily Eakin"</a> (via <a href="http://tldr.io" target="_blank">tldr.io</a>) <ul> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">Deconstruction posits "every structure...that organizes our experience is constituted and maintained through acts of exclusion.” & the excluded always come back</li> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">Derrida's insights into exclusion are rooted in experiences like the racism of his youth and his denial of professorship in Paris</li> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">"Americans, it’s been said, often got Derrida wrong: deconstruction was never intended as a reproducible methodology, let alone a political weapon."</li> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">Peeters casts Derrida as "perennial outsider," and in his words “has refused to exclude anything” resulting in a "surfeit of equivalency" wrt Derrida's life</li> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">Peeter's posits "the underlying intuition—that in Derrida’s abstractions was a powerful story about the experience of being shut out and unheard" are sound</li> </ul> </p></blockquote><script async src="//tldr.io/embed/widget-embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="tldr-embed-widget" data-show-title="true" data-align="center"> <p> <a href="http://tldr.io/tldrs/5158730103d9cda74300002c/scholarship-beyond-the-paper" class="link-to-tldr-page" target="_blank">Summary of "Scholarship: Beyond the paper"</a> (via <a href="http://tldr.io" target="_blank">tldr.io</a>) <ul> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">The web is transforming scholarly communication, erasing the artificial distinction between process and product. Peer-review does not scale with the web.</li> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">Peer-review's filtering function will be replaced by algorithms that distill community impact; PageRank-like altmetrics are a new "decoupled" measure of impact</li> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">'decoupled journals' embrace open, interoperable web services & standards. They filter/review though continuous, not punctuated, flows of evaluation</li> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">Reward structures WILL evolve to recognize new metrics & scholarly products. What to do? Publish new web-native products & take risks w/ web-publishing.</li> <li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">"scholarship has always been a community enterprise" & that community is online. Let's leverage the web's affordances to publish, share, & evaluate new products</li> </ul> </p></blockquote><script async src="//tldr.io/embed/widget-embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="tldr-embed-widget" data-show-title="true" data-align="center"><p><a href="http://tldr.io/tldrs/516586620962068049000095/discovering-scholarship-on-the-open-web-communities-and-methods" class="link-to-tldr-page" target="_blank">Summary of "Discovering Scholarship on the Open Web: Communities and Methods"</a> (via <a href="http://tldr.io" target="_blank">tldr.io</a>)<ul><li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">"This report outlines the current state of the aggregation, curation, evaluation, and distribution of scholarship on the open web." especially "gray lit"</li><li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">Finding quality gray lit dispersed across the web is challenging, hard to "to identify, evaluate, collect, and highlight."</li><li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">Four categories of content management on the open web: Repositories (arXive), aggregators (techmeme), post-pub peer-review (F1000), curated content (DHNow)</li><li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">quality can be determined via features of the content or features of its use. Editorial oversight is still crucial to selection. challenge: how to automate</li><li style="margin-bottom: 10px; line-height: 130%;">Article outlines an 8 point rubric for evaluating scholarly comm on the open web. claims: we need better FOSS tools to assist editors for managing open content</li></ul></p></blockquote><script async src="//tldr.io/embed/widget-embed.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
</body>
</html>