Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Think of using aioaws instead of boto3 #10

Open
ediskandarov opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Think of using aioaws instead of boto3 #10

ediskandarov opened this issue Oct 19, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@ediskandarov
Copy link
Contributor

https://github.com/samuelcolvin/aioaws - is an asyncio friendly alternative to boto3

@melvinkcx
Copy link
Owner

aioaws seems good. Unfortunately, it doesn't support SQS yet.

@andrewthetechie
Copy link

https://github.com/aio-libs/aiobotocore would be a good async aws option

@danielloader
Copy link

https://github.com/terrycain/aioboto3 would be higher level and more suited than dropping boto3 for a botocore alike library.

@melvinkcx
Copy link
Owner

melvinkcx commented Apr 25, 2022

Thank you @andrewthetechie @danielloader for recommending the packages.
I somehow missed the notification of @andrewthetechie's reply. Apologies.

While both packages are good candidates, aiobotocore seems to be a more popular alternative:
Screenshot 2022-04-26 at 8 36 23
Screenshot 2022-04-26 at 8 36 28

I don't think I'll get the time to work on this in the nearest future. It'd be great if anyone interested will pick it up.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants