You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Needs to be tested and proven (encode & decode work on any input).
Method 2: Swap bit positions
This one is a bit more complicated because the encoder and decoder must be synchronized.
The range calculations are actually decoupled from the bits themselves, which means, if we swap the 1s and 0s with a certain frequency we can offset the implicit bias.
For example, on every 3 consecutive same bits, we do a swap. Or on every 2 consecutive 0s and every 3 consecutive 1s..
match bit ^ swap {0 => self.x1 = xmid + 1,
_ => self.x2 = xmid,}// ...ifcondition(){
swap ^= 1;}
The issue is this becomes a secondary model now. We don't want a model in the entropy coder.
Method 3: Modify the probability
We can statically modify the probability, for example add some percentage if it drops below 25%.
However, this again messes with the model's job. In a perfect world, the model gives perfectly accurate predictions, and any tinkering with them should result in entropy.
Perhaps the more general solution is letting the model offset the AC's bias. But then it is breaking it's single responsibility principle.. Hmm
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's a know fact arithmetic coders have a slight bias for 0s by default. This is usually small enough to go unnoticed (20-30 bytes).
Method 1 (preferred): Round on lerp
Simply shifting ceils results, rounding is more accurate.
Needs to be tested and proven (encode & decode work on any input).
Method 2: Swap bit positions
This one is a bit more complicated because the encoder and decoder must be synchronized.
The range calculations are actually decoupled from the bits themselves, which means, if we swap the 1s and 0s with a certain frequency we can offset the implicit bias.
For example, on every 3 consecutive same bits, we do a swap. Or on every 2 consecutive 0s and every 3 consecutive 1s..
The issue is this becomes a secondary model now. We don't want a model in the entropy coder.
Method 3: Modify the probability
We can statically modify the probability, for example add some percentage if it drops below 25%.
However, this again messes with the model's job. In a perfect world, the model gives perfectly accurate predictions, and any tinkering with them should result in entropy.
Perhaps the more general solution is letting the model offset the AC's bias. But then it is breaking it's single responsibility principle.. Hmm
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: