Skip to content

feat: easier steady-state vs transient period selection #2359

@wpbonelli

Description

@wpbonelli

We should think about some way to simplify the selection of steady state and transient stress periods. This is relevant to e.g. the storage package

Originally posted by @mjr-deltares in #2352 (comment)

Hey @jlarsen-usgs , I looked at the failing test and realized I was having similar issues. The storage package is created with:

        ... 
        steady_state={0: True, 1: False},
        transient={0: False, 1: True},
    )

which the splitter can't process into something valid. Reducing it to:


    steady_state={0: True},
    transient={1 : True},
)

works as intended.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions