You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Quantify the numerical precision of the ablated MRIQC-T1w IQMs with a significant-bit / significant-digit analysis derived from the MCA instrumentation (#1442), reporting how many bits (or digits) of each IQM are reproducible under floating-point perturbation, for the ablated pipeline versus the standard MRIQC.
Rationale
Bland–Altman (nipreps/fmriprep-equivalence#9) captures agreement between two pipelines; the significant-bit metric captures the intrinsic numerical precision of each pipeline's IQMs — how many bits survive floating-point perturbation. Together they give a complete numerical-equivalence picture: the ablated pipeline should not only agree with the reference on average but also carry comparable numerical precision.
Note
Precision and agreement are distinct properties: two pipelines can agree on average yet differ in how many bits of each IQM are reproducible. Significant bits is the deepest test of the numerical-equivalence oracle.
Compare the ablated vs reference significant-bit distributions per IQM.
Report per-IQM significant-bit results, flagging any IQM where the ablated pipeline loses precision relative to the reference.
Outcomes/impact
A per-IQM significant-bit report showing whether the ablated MRIQC-T1w carries numerical precision comparable to the standard MRIQC.
Impact. The significant-bit dimension of the numerical-equivalence oracle, extending the verifier beyond agreement statistics — and, together with the Bland–Altman agreement analysis (nipreps/fmriprep-equivalence#9), the evidence that the ablated MRIQC is numerically equivalent to the reference before the methodology scales to the full fMRIPrep ablation.
Objective
Quantify the numerical precision of the ablated MRIQC-T1w IQMs with a significant-bit / significant-digit analysis derived from the MCA instrumentation (#1442), reporting how many bits (or digits) of each IQM are reproducible under floating-point perturbation, for the ablated pipeline versus the standard MRIQC.
Rationale
Bland–Altman (nipreps/fmriprep-equivalence#9) captures agreement between two pipelines; the significant-bit metric captures the intrinsic numerical precision of each pipeline's IQMs — how many bits survive floating-point perturbation. Together they give a complete numerical-equivalence picture: the ablated pipeline should not only agree with the reference on average but also carry comparable numerical precision.
Note
Precision and agreement are distinct properties: two pipelines can agree on average yet differ in how many bits of each IQM are reproducible. Significant bits is the deepest test of the numerical-equivalence oracle.
Methodological approach
Outcomes/impact
Impact. The significant-bit dimension of the numerical-equivalence oracle, extending the verifier beyond agreement statistics — and, together with the Bland–Altman agreement analysis (nipreps/fmriprep-equivalence#9), the evidence that the ablated MRIQC is numerically equivalent to the reference before the methodology scales to the full fMRIPrep ablation.
Direct upstream issues
(issues this one depends on / builds upon)
Direct downstream issues
(issues that depend on this one)
None on the board yet — feeds the numerical-equivalence oracle informally.