Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
71 lines (45 loc) · 5.38 KB

Questions on sets.md

File metadata and controls

71 lines (45 loc) · 5.38 KB

How HashSet Ensures Uniqueness of Elements

HashSet relies on two methods—hashCode() and equals()—to ensure that all elements within the set are unique. Here’s how it works:

  1. hashCode():

    • Each object in Java has a hashCode() method, which HashSet uses to compute the hash code of elements. When an object is added to a HashSet, it calculates its hash code to determine the "bucket" (location) in memory where it should be stored.
    • If two objects have the same hash code, they may end up in the same bucket. This situation is called a "hash collision."

  2. equals():

    • When two objects have the same hash code, HashSet uses the equals() method to check if they are indeed the same object or just have the same hash code by coincidence.
    • If equals() returns true, it means the objects are identical in terms of content, so the new object will not be added to the set.
    • If equals() returns false, even if they have the same hash code, the objects are considered different, and the new object can be added to the set.

This combination of hashCode() and equals() ensures that HashSet can efficiently identify duplicate elements and maintain uniqueness.

What is an EnumSet, and How is it Different from Other Set Implementations?

EnumSet is a specialized Set implementation optimized for enums. Here are its key characteristics and differences from other sets:

  1. Only for Enums:

    • EnumSet is designed exclusively for use with enum types. It cannot store other types of objects, making it a specialized tool for managing enums.

  2. Efficient Implementation:

    • Internally, EnumSet uses bitwise operations to store enum constants, leveraging the fact that enums are finite and typically few in number. Each enum constant is represented by a bit in an integer or long, making operations like add, remove, and contains extremely fast compared to other set implementations.

  3. Memory Efficiency:

    • Since EnumSet uses a compact bit-vector representation, it consumes less memory than other Set implementations like HashSet or TreeSet. It’s especially efficient for storing small sets of enum constants.

  4. Performance:

    • EnumSet is generally faster than other sets for operations involving enums. Bitwise operations allow it to perform common operations in constant time, making it much faster than HashSet or LinkedHashSet for enum-specific tasks.

In summary, EnumSet is optimized for enums and provides a highly efficient, memory-saving, and fast alternative to other Set implementations when working with enums.

Here are some commonly asked interview questions on Set:

Conceptual Questions

  1. What makes HashSet not thread-safe? How would you make it thread-safe?

    • HashSet is not synchronized, so concurrent modifications by multiple threads can lead to data corruption. To make it thread-safe, you can wrap it with Collections.synchronizedSet(new HashSet<>()) or use ConcurrentSkipListSet, which is thread-safe and sorted.

  2. How does HashSet handle collisions, and what happens if too many collisions occur?

    • HashSet uses chaining for collision resolution, where entries with the same hash code are stored in linked lists within the same bucket. If the load factor (default is 0.75) is exceeded, the hash table is resized to reduce collisions.

  3. What are the time complexities of add, remove, and contains operations in HashSet and TreeSet?

    • HashSet has an average O(1) time complexity for add, remove, and contains operations, while TreeSet has O(log n) for these operations due to its underlying Red-Black tree structure.

  4. Can two different objects be considered equal in a HashSet? How?

    • Yes, if two objects have the same hashCode() and are considered equal by the equals() method, HashSet considers them duplicates and will only store one instance.

  5. How would you implement a custom Comparator for TreeSet?

    • You can create a custom Comparator class implementing the Comparator interface, then pass an instance of this comparator to the TreeSet constructor to define a custom sorting order.

Scenario-Based Questions

  1. In a high-performance application, would you use HashSet or TreeSet? Why?

    • Use HashSet for higher performance if sorting isn’t required, as it provides O(1) average time complexity for lookups, adds, and deletes, compared to TreeSet's O(log n).

  2. If you have to frequently check for the existence of an element, which Set implementation would you choose?

    • HashSet is preferred because of its constant time complexity for lookups on average.

  3. How would you remove duplicates from a collection of elements while also sorting them?

    • Use a TreeSet, which removes duplicates and sorts the elements automatically.

  4. If you need a set that maintains insertion order and is synchronized, which combination would you use?

    • Use Collections.synchronizedSet(new LinkedHashSet<>());, which will maintain insertion order and provide synchronized access.

  5. Explain a scenario where using a Set instead of a List can significantly improve performance.

    • When collecting unique identifiers (like user IDs or product IDs) and ensuring no duplicates exist, Set improves performance because it prevents duplicates and allows efficient lookups without sorting or ordering requirements.