You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Rust as a language has had a lot of energy lately in part due to the push for "memory-safe" languages, and in part because it's just a neat language to work with (IMHO). But it's also focused on systems programming, which makes it less immediately attractive to some scientific users who prefer higher-level languages. How should we/should we bridge that gap? Is it really worth thinking about or should we focus on higher-level languages like Python? Discuss.
Should not be scheduled in parallel with #14, as there's a lot of overlap between rust and webassembly.
MSanKeys963
added
unconference
To designate a proposed unconference topic for the NumFOCUS 2024 Project Summit
scheduled
and removed
unconference
To designate a proposed unconference topic for the NumFOCUS 2024 Project Summit
labels
Sep 5, 2024
Rust as a language has had a lot of energy lately in part due to the push for "memory-safe" languages, and in part because it's just a neat language to work with (IMHO). But it's also focused on systems programming, which makes it less immediately attractive to some scientific users who prefer higher-level languages. How should we/should we bridge that gap? Is it really worth thinking about or should we focus on higher-level languages like Python? Discuss.
Session Notes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: