Your investment funds the publication of - 34 humanities journals + 35 humanities journals while supporting our collective goal to make scholarly publishing fairer, more accessible and rigorously preserved for the digital future.
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@We are not a subscription publisher, charging fees for exclusive access to our journals. Instead, your investment funds - 34 open-access journals + 35 open-access journals in the humanities, with no author-facing charges, making them accessible to anyone with an internet connection.
By supporting us, you join over 340 libraries worldwide who are @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
Higher-level OLH membership helps us expand. We use these funds to @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@
- 34 + 35 {% comment %} {{ request.press.public_journals.count }} {% endcomment %} diff --git a/templates/custom/frequently-asked-questions.html b/templates/custom/frequently-asked-questions.html index 474e946..276a925 100644 --- a/templates/custom/frequently-asked-questions.html +++ b/templates/custom/frequently-asked-questions.html @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
It’s cheaper for your library to join the OLH and pay an annual membership, which funds the publication of 500 articles across - 34 journals each year, + 35 journals each year, than to pay a single Article Processing Charge (APC) to publish one article open access with a legacy publisher. (Typically, it costs a humanities researcher c.£2,500 / €2,894 / diff --git a/templates/custom/olh-numbers-infographic.html b/templates/custom/olh-numbers-infographic.html index 62a3ed2..a2a397a 100644 --- a/templates/custom/olh-numbers-infographic.html +++ b/templates/custom/olh-numbers-infographic.html @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ {% component_block "infographic_grid_item" icon="Governance-and-Finances.svg" %}
The OLH has grown from 7 journals in 2015 to - 34 journals + 35 journals in {% now "Y" %}
{% endcomponent_block %} diff --git a/templates/custom/publisher-policies.html b/templates/custom/publisher-policies.html index 986e6f4..bbd79e2 100644 --- a/templates/custom/publisher-policies.html +++ b/templates/custom/publisher-policies.html @@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ Open-access policy | Anti-plagiarism checking | Rigorous peer review | - Archiving and indexing + Archiving and indexing | + Generative artificial intelligenceThe use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in scholarly publishing has evolved rapidly, coinciding with the development of better trained AI models and other technological advances. In recognition of the need for clarity on acceptable and unacceptable generative AI uses in academic research, and in all areas of the publishing workflow, we have produced extensive guidance for authors, journal editors and peer reviewers in our Artificial Intelligence Policy. All parties in the publishing process must consult and follow the content of our AI policy.
+We continue to monitor the latest international scholarly debates and legal frameworks for generative AI use, while consulting the editorial teams of our journals, to reflect a truly community-led, humanities-focussed approach to this nascent but increasingly ubiquitous technology. Our policy on generative AI is an evolving document that draws upon the current legal status of generative AI in terms of authorship, but also considers the impact of generative AI use on research integrity, accessibility, and publication ethics and malpractice.
{% endcomponent_block %}Authors with work published in OLH journals retain their copyright but grant the ability for the publisher to disseminate the work under Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0 (and, in very rare circumstances, under other CC licences). Full details are available on the ‘Copyright Notice’ of the ‘Submissions’ page of our journals.
+Authors who have used generative AI in the research and writing process for their work according to OLH's appropriate use cases (given in full in our Artificial Intelligence Policy) should note that all generative AI outputs are the responsibility of the author and the author must claim responsibility for and have full oversight of any use(s) of generative AI in their research. This is because generative AI is not a person and does not have the legal agency to hold its own copyright or to be considered a (co-)author. Please see our AI Policy in full for further information on the acceptable use cases of generative AI.
Research involving human subjects, human material, or human data, must have been performed in accordance with the Declaration - of Helsinki. Where applicable, the + href="https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/">Declaration of Helsinki. Where applicable, the studies must have been approved by an appropriate ethics committee and the authors should include a statement within the article text detailing this approval, including the name of the ethics committee and reference number of @@ -408,6 +412,7 @@
Editors must not use generative AI to make any editorial decisions for them; generative AI does not have the legal agency to do so. Editors must give their own due scrutiny to each submission made to their journal and this includes making all editorial decisions for submitted work. Please see our Artificial Intelligence Policy in full for further information.
Editors are expected to uphold the highest standards of good and amicable conduct in their working relationships with authors, editors, reviewers, and with the publisher. Editors must raise any issues in the journal's editorial workflow with other parties swiftly and clearly, without causing any undue animosity. Editors are also expected to behave ethically and responsibly throughout the publishing workflow. Any allegations of abusive or otherwise concerning behaviour from editors towards other parties must be raised with the publisher.
Reviewers should conduct reviews with as much supporting evidence for their claims as possible, to avoid undue subjective bias. Any relevant sources that the author has failed to cite should be suggested where possible and an explanation of their relevance should be given. If a reviewer has concerns about the manuscript, such as plagiarism of or similarity to another’s work, they must contact the editors immediately with an explanation of their concerns.
+Reviewers must not use generative AI to fabricate peer review reports for author submissions. Should a reviewer be found to be using generative AI to fabricate a peer review report, the journal editor(s) will disregard the review in the editorial decision-making process for the article. For further information on acceptable and unacceptable uses of generative AI for reviewers, please see OLH's full Artificial Intelligence Policy.
Reviewers should not engage in coercive citation manipulation practices in which they suggest that an author should revise their @@ -516,6 +522,8 @@
Authors should not engage in excessive citation of their own work, or an over-reliance on the research of any single author when constructing their own argument and writing their original research. An example of this would be recycling many quotations of a pre-existing publication by the author in their newly submitted research, or citing another researcher’s original work throughout the manuscript to the extent that the author’s own argument is lacking. Authors should also not cite solely to raise the citation frequency of any journal, or of any individual.
If an author suspects that the journal’s editor is pressuring them to include citations or references to work that is the editor’s own, or by a journal that the editor has engagement with in a way that the author believes to be unnecessarily coercive, they should inform the journal’s Editor-in-Chief immediately, or the publisher, so that a full investigation can take place into the alleged misconduct.
Authors should not, where any data is given, knowingly amend or alter it to suit their own analyses or argument. Such falsification of data is serious and will result in a malpractice investigation which may lead to article rejection, correction, retraction or removal from the journal.
+Authors must read and abide by OLH's Artificial Intelligence Policy in full before submitting work to an OLH journal. Authors must adhere to acceptable and responsible uses of generative AI in their research, and they must determine whether they need to make an 'AI Declaration Statement' as indicated by OLH's policy for the transparency of research methods and for ethical best practice. Authors assume full responsibility of all generative AI outputs, in all cases, and must have oversight of all acceptable generative AI uses as stated in our full AI Policy.
Articles should list names of all those who contributed to the published work, to ensure transparency and the academic integrity of the research. Authors take @@ -566,6 +574,7 @@
Where editors wish to incorporate the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT) system to acknowledge different models of contribution, this is permitted on a case-by-case basis.
+The authorship or co-authorship of an article cannot be attributed to generative AI models or any other generative AI tools or technologies; generative AI is not considered a legal entity and does not meet the criteria for authorship in any capacity. Submitting authors are responsible for all generative AI uses, oversight, and outputs in their research. Authors should consult OLH's Artificial Intelligence Policy for further detailed information.
{% endcomponent_block %}Hosting - 34 peer-reviewed academic journals + 35 peer-reviewed academic journals (and counting!), including our flagship Open Library of Humanities Journal.
We oversee editorial processes and provide support to our diff --git a/templates/custom/who-we-are.html b/templates/custom/who-we-are.html index 4e2263e..3b57e4c 100644 --- a/templates/custom/who-we-are.html +++ b/templates/custom/who-we-are.html @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
We publish - 34 open-access journals + 35 open-access journals and are funded by more than 345 libraries worldwide, who have joined us in our mission to make scholarly publishing fairer, more accessible, and rigorously preserved for the digital future.