You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we only include a highway=trackin the trails layer if it has an access tag indicating someone has mapped it for some non-motorcar traffic. This nicely pares down the amount of data, but excludes a lot of ways that people would expect to see as trails.
It might be better to reverse the expectation, and include tracks by default to encourage people to put access tags on them.
This should probably only be done with #40, to make it easy to tell which paths are allowing motorized traffic.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, we only include a
highway=track
in the trails layer if it has an access tag indicating someone has mapped it for some non-motorcar traffic. This nicely pares down the amount of data, but excludes a lot of ways that people would expect to see as trails.It might be better to reverse the expectation, and include tracks by default to encourage people to put access tags on them.
This should probably only be done with #40, to make it easy to tell which paths are allowing motorized traffic.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: