I'm checking V6 result towards V5 and I have a doubt about the report
With V5 I have this result:
With V6 I have a different result:
the vdr file is correct with 2 different vulnerabilties for ansi-regex@5.0.0 and ansi-regex@5.0.0 and ansi-regex@3.0.0
This is the sbom I use to debug this issue
SonarQube-master-short.cdx.json
vdr result for V5.5
SonarQube-master-short.cdx_V5.vdr.json
And V6 report files:
SonarQube-master-short_V6.vdr.json
depscan_V6.txt
I tried to understand and fix the procedure but I just found where it could be the issue:
In generate_console_output there is some code to group the packages before output but in this case there is a CVE with 2 different bom-ref
I think this is a bug but I'm not sure :)
Thanks !
Michela
I'm checking V6 result towards V5 and I have a doubt about the report
With V5 I have this result:
With V6 I have a different result:
the vdr file is correct with 2 different vulnerabilties for ansi-regex@5.0.0 and ansi-regex@5.0.0 and ansi-regex@3.0.0
This is the sbom I use to debug this issue
SonarQube-master-short.cdx.json
vdr result for V5.5
SonarQube-master-short.cdx_V5.vdr.json
And V6 report files:
SonarQube-master-short_V6.vdr.json
depscan_V6.txt
I tried to understand and fix the procedure but I just found where it could be the issue:
In generate_console_output there is some code to group the packages before output but in this case there is a CVE with 2 different bom-ref
I think this is a bug but I'm not sure :)
Thanks !
Michela