Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust "Upstream DNS Providers" #2178

Open
weyCC81 opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 10 comments
Open

Adjust "Upstream DNS Providers" #2178

weyCC81 opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 10 comments

Comments

@weyCC81
Copy link

weyCC81 commented Jan 2, 2025

Versions

N/A

Platform

N/A

Expected behavior

N/A

Actual behavior / bug

N/A

Steps to reproduce

N/A

Debug Token

N/A

Screenshots

Image
Image
Image

Additional context

Remove DNS.WATCH?

Who is running this?

Adjust Google for IPv6

2001:4860:4860::8888
2001:4860:4860::8844

Add Digital Society Switzerland

@yubiuser
Copy link
Member

yubiuser commented Jan 2, 2025

Seems to be online again

Image

@weyCC81
Copy link
Author

weyCC81 commented Jan 2, 2025

The main site, yes, but not the subsite's (menu).

Web: partly offline since summer 2024 apparently

Donate: last transaction=11/24/2023

This address has transacted 26 times on the Bitcoin blockchain. It has received a total of 0.16519136 BTC $16,052.65 and has sent a total of 0.16519136 BTC $16,052.65 The current value of this address is 0.00000000 BTC $0.00.

E-Mail:

  • dnswatch^pm.me

DNS Test to "google.com":
Image
Image

Who is running this service?

@yubiuser
Copy link
Member

yubiuser commented Jan 2, 2025

When did you noticed the site is down?
Currently, the dns server seems to have a some issues too. Maybe they have some high load

nanopi@nanopi:/$ dig google.com @84.200.69.80
;; communications error to 84.200.69.80#53: timed out

; <<>> DiG 9.18.28-1~deb12u2-Debian <<>> google.com @84.200.69.80
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65374
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;google.com.			IN	A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
google.com.		2	IN	A	142.250.184.174

;; Query time: 19 msec
;; SERVER: 84.200.69.80#53(84.200.69.80) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Thu Jan 02 18:25:10 CET 2025
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 2, 2025

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Please comment or update this issue or it will be closed in 5 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Feb 2, 2025
@phit
Copy link

phit commented Feb 5, 2025

still broken, not a fan of offering a dns server by default with no working website or privacy policy

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Feb 5, 2025
@mwoolweaver
Copy link

seems ok here. got this on the first try.

movies@blockbuster:~$ dig google.com @84.200.69.80

; <<>> DiG 9.20.0-2ubuntu4-Ubuntu <<>> google.com @84.200.69.80
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 22465
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1

;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 4096
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;google.com.			IN	A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
google.com.		282	IN	A	142.250.184.174

;; Query time: 152 msec
;; SERVER: 84.200.69.80#53(84.200.69.80) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Wed Feb 05 14:30:28 CST 2025
;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 55

@yubiuser
Copy link
Member

yubiuser commented Feb 5, 2025

Mhh... it timed out for me 3 times in a row. Service seems unreliable.

Transferring to FTL repo, as in v6 the default servers are handled from there.

@yubiuser yubiuser transferred this issue from pi-hole/pi-hole Feb 5, 2025
@phit
Copy link

phit commented Feb 5, 2025

it seems to time out basically every time it doesn't have the request in cache

@rdwebdesign
Copy link
Member

Here 84.200.69.80 worked correctly 3 times in a row and failed in a forth test (after a fast succession of attempts).
84.200.70.40 failed half of the attempts.

@DL6ER
Copy link
Member

DL6ER commented Feb 6, 2025

I tried dns.watch from a location close to Frankfurt (Germany) and get responses for both servers within 15 - 30 msec but also about 50% error rate. For comparison: ping de-cix.net is between 2 - 3 msec.

What do you suggest for Google IPv6? We already use the IP addresses you quoted (even when not in abbreviated form).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants