You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
To give you some context I have compared datas between compact file (SVMC files ) given by the reader viirs_compact and the the Mband files (SVM?? files) given by reader viirs_sdr. I'm expecting to have similar results which I get with radiance for all bands and brightness_temperature for the bands M12 to M16.
I have obtained some huge differences for the reflectance for the bands M01 to M11. I have checked into the viirs_compact reader I have seen that the reflectance is computed at those lines.
It seems that there is a term that is missing which is to divide by the cos(solar_zenith_angle) , hence I have applied those corrections
That should apply the regular satpy 1/cos(sunz) correction to the dataset. Please note that this correction starts to be reduced beyond 88 degrees, which is probably not the case in the viirs_sdr reader.
To give you some context I have compared datas between compact file (
SVMC
files ) given by the reader viirs_compact and the the Mband files (SVM??
files) given by reader viirs_sdr. I'm expecting to have similar results which I get withradiance
for all bands andbrightness_temperature
for the bandsM12
toM16
.I have obtained some huge differences for the
reflectance
for the bandsM01
toM11
. I have checked into the viirs_compact reader I have seen that thereflectance
is computed at those lines.It seems that there is a term that is missing which is to divide by the
cos(solar_zenith_angle)
, hence I have applied those correctionsWith the corrections that I have applied I get better results. Was the
cos(solar_zenith_angle)
missing on purpose ?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: