Replies: 2 comments 10 replies
0 replies
|
@languitar Quarkus REST Clients are not based on CXF, why would they use CXF classes? |
10 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Is there any reason why the resteasy REST client uses its own data types for multipart handling and not the types and annotations provided in
org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.ext.multipart? Or is there any chance to get support for these types? By default, they are generated by the OpenAPI generator target jax-rs and changing the templates to generate code compatible with the Quarkus-specific implementation is not the easiest task there.All reactions