You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello author!
I used the command line to test the methods in the "/examples" directory, with the test class being edu.berkeley.cs.jqf.examples.bcel.ParserTest and the test method being testWithGenerator. The command line is as follows:
However, I found that there are significant differences in memory usage between running with jqf-1.9 and jqf-2.0. The memory usage of jqf-1.9 is approximately 1GB, while the memory usage of jqf-2.0 is mostly above 5GB, even reaching over 8GB.
I want to know why this difference occurs and whether there is a way to reduce the memory usage of jqf-2.0, as I need to conduct multiple sets of tests simultaneously on one machine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @YangDingNY. This is a very interesting observation. Thanks for reporting it!
Let me tag @aoli-al who has done some memory profiling in the past. Leo, have you noticed this difference before or have any idea how to discover the source of the issue?
Hello author!
I used the command line to test the methods in the "/examples" directory, with the test class being
edu.berkeley.cs.jqf.examples.bcel.ParserTest
and the test method beingtestWithGenerator
. The command line is as follows:However, I found that there are significant differences in memory usage between running with jqf-1.9 and jqf-2.0. The memory usage of jqf-1.9 is approximately 1GB, while the memory usage of jqf-2.0 is mostly above 5GB, even reaching over 8GB.
I want to know why this difference occurs and whether there is a way to reduce the memory usage of jqf-2.0, as I need to conduct multiple sets of tests simultaneously on one machine.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: