Skip to content

tests: Skip supported-crate-types test on musl hosts #144144

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Gelbpunkt
Copy link
Contributor

@Gelbpunkt Gelbpunkt commented Jul 18, 2025

This test depends on the target-specific default of crt-static for musl targets. However, running the testsuite on a musl host requires setting crt-static to false, as it wouldn't otherwise be possible to build rustc. This in turn will enable -Ctarget-feature=-crt-static for all tests, mismatching the expected +crt-static for the musl target tested in this testcase.

Since this test specifically tests the default value of crt-static for the musl target, ignoring it entirely makes more sense than manually setting -Ctarget-feature=+crt-static here, but both would be valid approaches.

This test depends on the target-specific behavior of crt-static for musl
targets. However, running the testsuite on a musl host requires
setting `crt-static` to `false`, as it wouldn't otherwise be possible to
build rustc. This in turn will enable `-Ctarget-feature=-crt-static` for
all tests, mismatching the expected `+crt-static` for the musl target
tested in this testcase.

Since this test specifically tests the default value of `crt-static` for
the musl target, ignoring it entirely makes more sense than manually
setting `-Ctarget-feature=+crt-static` here, but both would be valid
approaches.

Signed-off-by: Jens Reidel <[email protected]>
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 18, 2025

r? @SparrowLii

rustbot has assigned @SparrowLii.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants