You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
54 crates they maintained on crates.io are updated within the last year.
The other 64 crates have been updated the last time over more than a year ago. Which makes me think, that rust-bus maintainers could be one of the main maintainers of these crates, and it might be warranted to assume they are now unmaintained?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
simonsan
changed the title
rust-bus is unmaintainedrust-bus crates are possibly unmaintained
Aug 24, 2023
I don't think this calls for a general action for all impacted crates (which also matches the approach adopted by the crates.io team). Most of these crates should have other maintainers, and in this case our usual maintenance policy applies.
However, crates having only rust-bus as maintainer on crates.io are probably worth an "unmaintained" advisory.
I just discovered https://github.com/rust-bus to be unmaintained and archived. They have a lot (possibly 118) of (now unmaintained?) crates on crates.io: https://crates.io/teams/github:rust-bus:maintainers
Does this need a
securityunmaintained crates advisory?I couldn't extract information regarding this special case from https://github.com/rustsec/advisory-db/blob/main/HOWTO_UNMAINTAINED.md
54 crates they maintained on crates.io are updated within the last year.
The other 64 crates have been updated the last time over more than a year ago. Which makes me think, that
rust-bus
maintainers could be one of the main maintainers of these crates, and it might be warranted to assume they are now unmaintained?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: