Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Import rules ignoring checksums #1832

Open
eugenesvk opened this issue Mar 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Import rules ignoring checksums #1832

eugenesvk opened this issue Mar 14, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
suggestion TYPE: idea for new feature or improvements

Comments

@eugenesvk
Copy link

What would you like to add or change?:

Allow re-importing manually rules ignoring the checksum

Why do you and others need this?:

Let's say I have an app and "mislicked" a few IP popup requests, denied 10 ips that should've been allowed and allowed 10 ips that should've been denied. Changing it via GUI is very tedious - it requires 4 clicks(!) per rule, and you can't batch-edit them (and even if you could clicking on each of those tiny checkmarks isn't good UI either)

Editing an exported text file is much easier - that could be a single batch renaming rule changing - to + or vice versa. But then I can't reimport the edited file due to a mismatching "jess-checksum"

@eugenesvk eugenesvk added the suggestion TYPE: idea for new feature or improvements label Mar 14, 2025
Copy link

Greetings and welcome to our community! As this is the first issue you opened here, we wanted to share some useful infos with you:

  • 🗣️ Our community on Discord is super helpful and active. We also have an AI-enabled support bot that knows Portmaster well and can give you immediate help.
  • 📖 The Wiki answers all common questions and has many important details. If you can't find an answer there, let us know, so we can add anything that's missing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
suggestion TYPE: idea for new feature or improvements
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant