Skip to content

Add a license #23

@treyhunner

Description

@treyhunner

Maybe we should do Creative Commons instead of MIT since this is largely documentation and not code?

I'm fine with public domain (CC0), as well as any of the other Creative Commons licenses (both commercial/non and share-alike/permissive).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions