Repository navigation
Replies: 3 comments 17 replies
|
I made some attempts to bring the Void packaging up to speed a while back, you can see the history in this PR. The comments in there about packaging location changes are still relevant, as well as your observation about needing a few more Lua modules to be packaged up. I would be glad to facilitate a refresh from this side but I do not actually use Void myself and am not familiar enough with its packaging routines to make the necessary changes. If somebody that cat take this on would be willing to jump in and start adding Lua modules and eventually bump the package that would be awesome. If there is anything further I can do whether answering questions about SILE or whatever I'd be glad to help. Note since the PR linked about the Lua dependencies have evolved a bit more. Off the top of my head the |
|
thank you. I might consider packaging for void in the future. Unrelated question, the readme says:
the seems not to be the case? At least no longer |
|
Took me some time to find what to look at: Visibly still in 0.9.5.1 I'd suggest removing support on the README, unless we have someone in the Void Linux community to help with it. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello, the manual says sile is available in Void, but the last available version there is 0.9.5. Maybe the manual needs to be updated?
I think the issue with Void not updating is that since that version many new lua libraries have been added as dependencies, and they all need to be packaged for Void.
All reactions