Remove Deprecations

[marcusdacoregio]

We should make sure that we remove them in 7.0.

• Remove .and() and non lambda methods from DSL #13067
• Remove shouldFilterAllDispatcherTypes #12139
• Remove LazyCsrfTokenRepository #13196
• Remove AbstractConfiguredSecurityBuilder#apply #13441
• Remove ApacheDS #13852
• Remove deprecations from CookieCsrfTokenRepository #14132
• Remove authorizeRequests #15174
• Remove RequestVariablesExtractor in favor of RequestMatcher#matcher #17308
• Remove AllowFromStrategy in favor of ContentSecurityPolicy #17307
• Remove no-version Open SAML implementations #17306
• Remove RelyingPartyRegistration deprecations #17305
• Remove AssertingPartyDetails from APIs in favor of AssertingPartyMetadata #17304
• Remove JwtIssuer(Reactive)AuthenticationManagerResolver deprecations #17303
• Remove Nimbus(Reactive)OpaqueTokenIntrospector #17302
• Remove DistinguishedName Usage #17301
• Removed deprecated Base64 of crypto package #17314
• Remove deprecated elements using AuthorizationDecision #17299
• Remove deprecated elements from DaoAuthenticationProvider #17298
• Remove deprecated elements of RoleHierarchyImpl #17297
• Remove PrePostTemplateDefaults #17296
• Remove AbstractSecurityWebSocketMessageBrokerConfigurer #17295
• Remove EnableWebMvcSecurity #17294
• Remove ACL access implementations in favor of AclPermissionEvaluator #17293
• Remove classes from old locations #17309
• Remove HandlerMappingIntrospector Usage #16886
• We should remove usage of PathMatcher in web modules #16887
• Remove deprecated implementations of OAuth2AccessTokenResponseClient #16909

[ASDasd341]

can i look into this?

[marcusdacoregio]

Hi @ASDasd341, thanks for volunteering to take it.

I am afraid that this is not the right time to start working on this issue since the replacement for some deprecation might not still be in place and some things might still change.

In addition to that, there is no branch for 7.0 so the PR would stay open for too long.

[andreilisa]

Hello @marcusdacoregio, I would like to work on it.

[sjohnr]

@jzheaux you may consider adding #16909 to this issue as well.