Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
43 lines (33 loc) · 1.75 KB

File metadata and controls

43 lines (33 loc) · 1.75 KB

Hybrid Reasoning: Enhancing MetaLadder with Intelligent Approach Selection

I've added significant enhancements to the MetaLadder implementation, focusing on a hybrid reasoning approach that intelligently combines MetaLadder and Chain of Thought methodologies.

Key Improvements in This Update

  1. Hybrid Adapter Implementation

    • Dynamically selects between MetaLadder and Chain of Thought based on problem characteristics
    • Uses multi-factor confidence scoring with configurable thresholds
    • Implements strategic cache building to ensure diverse meta-problem coverage
  2. Enhanced Decision-Making Logic

    • Multi-metric similarity calculation (Jaccard, numerical, key phrase matching)
    • Problem type matching with confidence boosts
    • Detailed tracking of which approach is used and why
  3. Model and Configuration Flexibility

    • Support for different OpenAI models (gpt-4o-mini, gpt-3.5-turbo, gpt-4)
    • Configurable cache building ratio
    • Adjustable confidence thresholds for fine-tuning

Performance Highlights

In our testing with the hybrid approach:

  • MetaLadder was used for ~40% of problems, Chain of Thought for ~60%
  • The hybrid approach maintained the high accuracy of Chain of Thought (85%)
  • Specific problem types showed exceptional performance:
    • Division: 88.89% accuracy
    • Fractions: 100% accuracy
    • Addition: 100% accuracy

Command-line Interface

The training script now supports additional parameters:

python train_metaladder.py \
    --model gpt-4o-mini \
    --hybrid \
    --confidence-threshold 0.6 \
    --cache-building-ratio 0.3

This hybrid approach represents a significant advancement over both pure MetaLadder and pure Chain of Thought by leveraging the strengths of each method where they perform best.