Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reconciliation results #35

Open
ghost opened this issue Nov 4, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

reconciliation results #35

ghost opened this issue Nov 4, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 4, 2019

Using the latest stable versions of open refine and the extension.
I created a reconciliation service based on a RDF file.
The content look as follows:

<http://data.erfgoedplus.be/place/148388#id> a egp:LookupEntity ;
	rdfs:label "Kerkplein (Begijnendijk)"^^xsd:string .

<http://data.erfgoedplus.be/place/148386#id> a egp:LookupEntity ;
	rdfs:label "Sint-Laurentiusstraat (Betekom)"^^xsd:string .

In the table I have a column with values e.g. Kerkplein (Begijnendijk) ... These are identical to the rdfs:labels in the rdf file.

Some observations running the reconciliation with auto-match.
Screenshot 2019-11-04 at 09 17 43

  1. The result of the matching is 40%. I expected this to be higher due to the complete similarity between the cell values and rdfs:labels.

Screenshot 2019-11-04 at 09 23 27

  1. When there is no automatic match, the proposed values have a low score e.g. 'Grote Spouwenstraat (Grote-Spouwen)' and are far away from the value looked-up.

  2. Clicking 'Search for a match', gives a list of potential matches with the correct one automatically highlighted.

Screenshot 2019-11-04 at 09 41 03

In one way or another the correct value is known, but is not used previously. Can I influence this?

There is an additional observation that if there are many matches, the correct one doesn't show up due to the limitation of the number of items in. the list shown. There are many Kerkstraten (churchstreets): Kerkstraat (A), Kerstraat (AA), ... A list ttoo long for the current interface.

@Gautamshahi
Copy link

I am sorry I can not help in your issue, but I am wondering how have you added the SPARQL endpoint for the reconciliation.

I am facing the issue with DBpedia Reconciliation service.

Please let me if you have any hint for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant