Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of Ecology and new repos #105

Closed
mkborregaard opened this issue Sep 4, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

Status of Ecology and new repos #105

mkborregaard opened this issue Sep 4, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@mkborregaard
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
It is hard to find "Ecology", as it is an entry under both Biology and Earth Sciences, with different things listed under each. Maybe nice to put it under one of them, and then have a local link under the other? The problem is, of course, that Ecology isn't easy to place into either - it's position under earth science or biology varies from university to university.

Also, you might check out our registered organisation for ecology in Julia, https://github.com/EcoJulia/ , and our repos https://github.com/EcoJulia/SpatialEcology.jl and https://github.com/EcoJulia/GBIF.jl .

Thanks!

@svaksha
Copy link
Owner

svaksha commented Sep 4, 2017

Hi, you are right about the inter-disciplinary nature of some (sub)-categories that makes it hard to specifically slot them in a single category. However, please feel free to add your Org (& packages) to an existing page - feel free to slot it in the category you think it is best suited under and submit a pull request. I will gladly merge it. Thanks.

@mkborregaard
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great, thanks. Would you merge a pull request that put ecology as one cohesive category?

@svaksha
Copy link
Owner

svaksha commented Sep 4, 2017

As long as the packages "fit" (for lack of a better term) there, it should be fine. Please submit a PR for your changes.

Later, if there are many biology, geography, and Earth science packages, we can create a new 'Ecology' page.

PS: Aside, I like the Tiddlywiki concept of "tagging" tiddlers (which solves the category overlap issue, somewhat) and also using various macros, but the markdown (used by github) does not support it. And it would be quite confusing and painful to read tiddlers in the raw format. (/end thinking out loud)

@svaksha svaksha closed this as completed in 2d07bf7 Sep 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants