Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

classification of optimization #21

Closed
mlubin opened this issue Jan 24, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

classification of optimization #21

mlubin opened this issue Jan 24, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@mlubin
Copy link

mlubin commented Jan 24, 2015

I don't think "Optimization" is properly classified under benchmarks. I would suggest moving this section to a "numerical optimization" section under mathematics which includes JuliaOpt and all related projects. Also, Cbc.jl, JuMP, and JuMPeR are operations research/optimization projects, not linear algebra.

@IainNZ
Copy link
Contributor

IainNZ commented Jan 24, 2015

Other things I spotted:

@IainNZ
Copy link
Contributor

IainNZ commented Jan 24, 2015

Maybe easiest thing to do, in general actually, would be to mirror organizations where they exist - so all JuliaOpt packages could be kept together, JuliaWeb, etc.

@svaksha
Copy link
Owner

svaksha commented Jan 28, 2015

@mlubin, As @IainNZ suggested, would 'Optimization' be better suited as a sub-section under Operations Research or maybe Statistics (where it was previously)?
I've moved "Cbc.jl, JuMP, and JuMPeR" to the OR section, will be reflected when I push to master.

@IainNZ, good point. Just to understand, are you suggesting JuliaWeb be moved elsewhere or were you suggesting all the Optimization packages be listed like its been done for JuliaWeb? Atm, the orgs get listed under the broad category they fall in - example, JuliaQuant org gets listed under the Valuation (finance) section on the Statistics page as most of the packages tend to be statistics heavy.

@IainNZ
Copy link
Contributor

IainNZ commented Jan 28, 2015

@svaksha , the second, like JuliaWeb

@svaksha
Copy link
Owner

svaksha commented Jan 29, 2015

Ok, done: 1bf6d27

@svaksha svaksha closed this as completed Jan 29, 2015
svaksha added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 29, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants