Replies: 1 comment
|
You could consider setting |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
**What version of Tailwind CSS are you using?**v4
For example: v4.0.6
**What build tool (or framework if it abstracts the build tool) are you using?**Nuxt js 4.6, vite 8
For example: postcss-cli 11.0.0, Next.js 15.1.7, Vite 6.1.0
**What version of Node.js are you using?**v24
For example: v20.0.0
**What browser are you using?**Firefox
For example: Chrome, Safari, or N/A
**What operating system are you using?**Windows
For example: macOS, Windows
Reproduction URL
A Tailwind Play link or public GitHub repo that includes a minimal reproduction of the bug. Please do not link to your actual project, what we need instead is a minimal reproduction in a fresh project without any unnecessary code. This means it doesn't matter if your real project is private/confidential, since we want a link to a separate, isolated reproduction anyways.
A reproduction is required when filing an issue — any issue opened without a reproduction will be closed and you'll be asked to create a new issue that includes a reproduction. We're a small team and we can't keep up with the volume of issues we receive if we need to reproduce each issue from scratch ourselves.
Describe your issue
VS Code see tailwind CSS file as just a CSS file and that shows problem when tailwind specific syntax is used. I have to manually change the language to tailwind every time to fix the issue. I want to suggest that a suffix should be adopted for tailwind CSS files to help IDEs differentiate a tailwind CSS file from a regular CSS file.
Something like main.tw.css that maybe compile to main.css
Describe the problem you're seeing, any important steps to reproduce and what behavior you expect instead.
All reactions