Skip to content

Conversation

@gibson042
Copy link
Member

Split from #3629 as requested at #3629 (comment) , starting with AO reordering because internal movement is a big cause of avoidable merge conflicts.

@michaelficarra michaelficarra requested a review from a team June 27, 2025 19:22
@bakkot
Copy link
Member

bakkot commented Jun 30, 2025

LGTM once the assert is fixed.

@gibson042 gibson042 force-pushed the 3629-typedarray-ao-ordering branch from 706c645 to 863c536 Compare June 30, 2025 18:29
@bakkot bakkot added the ready to merge Editors believe this PR needs no further reviews, and is ready to land. label Jun 30, 2025
…TypedArray (tc39#3632)

The new [serendipitously alphabetical] ordering makes more obvious how
SetTypedArrayFromTypedArray is a specialized adaptation of
SetTypedArrayFromArrayLike when viewing the spec in top-to-bottom order.
@ljharb ljharb force-pushed the 3629-typedarray-ao-ordering branch from 863c536 to 60c4df0 Compare June 30, 2025 21:26
@ljharb ljharb merged commit 60c4df0 into tc39:main Jun 30, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready to merge Editors believe this PR needs no further reviews, and is ready to land.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants