Repository navigation
Claude-Mem Feedback #110
Replies: 6 comments 4 replies
|
Hi, I think this is a great idea overall, is in the development roadmap a way to tweak the system memories per project? I find counterproductive to have it pop in my second brain root, because theres where I manage all my projects and every new chat gets context pollution, but is not only in my second brain where it gets annoying, I also work in different parts of repositories at the same time, for example working on frontend work and backend work in other instance but as you can imagine each thread start getting polluted by the other tasks happening in the other areas I could envision a way to enable memories per feature, and the ability to also turn on and off memories per repository, that would make it really usable for me. Cheers! |
|
I think the main issue for me is that I cant deactivate it on a per project basis, correct me if Im wrong, I use claude code for software development but also as a second brain and not being able to disable in the second brain is a problem because it injects unrelated memories to every new chat, unless Im using it wrong |
|
root > projects > category > [project_root] |
|
Hey there, Amazing stuff. I started using CC recently but using your plugin made a huge difference. I combine it with .md "mission progress" files and found that with the combination of memory + progress files, it's easy to switch between branches and rebuild a knowledge in a few seconds. So first, thank you so much for releasing such a helpful project. One thing that I find a bit vague is the documentation about Folder Context Files. Maybe I'm too much of a newbie regarding CC, but I don't understand:
Thanks again |
|
Hey, been using Claude-Mem for a couple months now — the automatic capture is what sold me. Not having to remember to tell Claude to save something is the difference between a tool I use and one I abandon. One thing I kept running into: after a few weeks of daily sessions, recall quality started degrading. Not a bug exactly — more that all memories are treated equally, so a decision from two months ago has the same weight as something I decided yesterday. I ended up wanting a way to mark some memories as more important than others and have older low-signal ones age out automatically. I went down a bit of a rabbit hole on this and ended up building something adjacent — MnemoPay, which is an MCP server with importance scoring and time decay so memories compete for relevance instead of all showing up equally. Also has a payment layer for multi-agent use cases (different problem, same repo). The Stop hook pattern I landed on for session summaries might be useful here too: a Stop hook blocks exit once and uses that moment to write a structured summary while the context is still clean. Works better than pre-compaction hooks for cases where the compaction happens when context is already stressed. Anyway — genuinely useful tool. The auto-capture alone is worth the setup. |
|
Hi, I'm just starting using it, so not a long term feedback from now, but as far a I can see there is 2 stuff missing that would be great:
Anyway, the overall productivity gain of claude-mem is amazing ! Thanks for this. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello Claude-Mem...bers? 😂
Thank you so much for trying Claude-Mem! Creating this has been a labor of love for me, and I am so grateful for such a positive response from the community.
I am posting this discussion to serve as a place for anyone to post feedback, comments, concerns, hate mail, love letters, anything you'd like to share about how Claude-Mem is working.
Please feel free to write positive or negative feedback! It is all valuable and will always be considered when it comes to improving Claude-Mem for all of us. 😃
Thanks,
@thedotmack
All reactions