Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automate cascade releases for s2i images #359

Open
1 of 4 tasks
codificat opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 8 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks

Automate cascade releases for s2i images #359

codificat opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 8 comments
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/devsecops Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG DevSecOps. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.

Comments

@codificat
Copy link
Member

codificat commented Dec 2, 2021

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Every time an update is released is made on a package that is part of a base image, we have to wait for the change to be included in the whole chain of images that contain that package.

For example, an update can take this path: s2i-minimal -> s2i-lab -> s2i-custom-notebook, and only then we can use the actual "end user focused" image containing the update.

Currently, each of these updates is handled manually.

Many projects depend on this type of chains of base images.

High-level Goals

A possibility could be a new kebechet manager that works similar to the package updates but for container images.

With that in place, updates can be triggered manually by opening issues for Kebechet. Later, the creation of these issues can be automated following the image cascade path.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Keep it manual.

Additional context

Discussed in a community tech talk on 2021-11-18 (recording).

aicoe-ci pipelines can handle sibling releases, but this is parent/child dependency.

Acceptance Criteria

@codificat codificat added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/...` label and requires one. labels Dec 2, 2021
@goern
Copy link
Member

goern commented Dec 9, 2021

/priority important-soon

@sesheta sesheta added the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Dec 9, 2021
@codificat
Copy link
Member Author

/triage accepted
as this was the intention from the tech talk where this was proposed

@sesheta sesheta added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/...` label and requires one. labels Dec 21, 2021
@goern
Copy link
Member

goern commented Feb 22, 2022

I think this is not planned for the current sprint?!
/priority backlog

@sesheta sesheta added the priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. label Feb 22, 2022
@codificat
Copy link
Member Author

/sig devsecops

@sesheta sesheta added the sig/devsecops Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG DevSecOps. label May 2, 2022
@sesheta
Copy link
Member

sesheta commented Jul 31, 2022

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@sesheta sesheta added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jul 31, 2022
@harshad16
Copy link
Member

/remove-lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen

@sesheta sesheta added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Aug 9, 2022
@codificat codificat removed the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Sep 19, 2022
@harshad16 harshad16 moved this to New in SIG-DevSecOps Sep 22, 2022
@codificat codificat moved this to 🆕 New in Planning Board Sep 26, 2022
@VannTen
Copy link
Member

VannTen commented Oct 6, 2022

The way you can do this with Openshift BuildConfig is pretty elegant:
Build of parent triggered -> ImageStream X change -> BuildConfig with trigger on X trigger a build
-> chain and repeat ad nauseam.

We might want to take a lookt at Tekton Trigger to see if it's feasible to hook them up with ImageStream ; or what else we can use to detect new images tags / versions.

@goern
Copy link
Member

goern commented Oct 6, 2022

/remove-lifecycle frozen
/priority backlog

@sesheta sesheta removed the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Oct 6, 2022
@harshad16 harshad16 moved this from 🆕 New to 📋 Backlog in Planning Board Oct 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. sig/devsecops Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG DevSecOps. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants