Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setup client for pgvectorscale #128

Open
Drzhivago264 opened this issue Aug 26, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Setup client for pgvectorscale #128

Drzhivago264 opened this issue Aug 26, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Drzhivago264
Copy link

Drzhivago264 commented Aug 26, 2024

Hello thank you for the project,
Can you please clarify about the process of using this extension with pgvector client.
For now I guess the process is:

  1. setup pgvector and pgvectorscale.
  2. install client and setup a table with embeddingfield (ignore pgvector indexes option)
  3. go down to sql server and manually setup the new fancier ANN index things (i read both papers and grasp the idea but this seems like big brain businesses).
  4. go up to high level client and do business as usual.

Here is my question:

  1. i believe the indexes manage itself so no need to rebuild after a specific period of time.
  2. current pgvector clients are compatible with pgvectorscale, meaning there is no raw sql queries differences between the two.

I am ask this because I am using Django and it will be a pain for me to have one table that needs custom raw sql and to be manually managed outside of Django Orm and model management.
Thank you for your clarification.

Tasks

No tasks being tracked yet.
@jumasheff
Copy link

Came here to upvote this comment. I am going to use this extension in my Django project as well. I think your project is gaining momentum since people started to realize that you can use battle tested technology stack in a RAG setting without having to use fancy vector DBs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants
@jumasheff @Drzhivago264 and others