Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve GAM plots #159

Open
damianooldoni opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Improve GAM plots #159

damianooldoni opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@damianooldoni
Copy link
Collaborator

By default we prefer using the number of occurrences/occupied grid cells at class level as covariate in apply_gam().
The returned GAM plots can look quite weird in this case. The GAM fitting line and the colored dots could be very far from the black dots showing the real values. See graph below.

Some thoughts: if the covariate is used:

  • the black dots should not be placed in the same plot of the GAM fitting
  • 3 subplots: real values, real values at class level, GAM fitting

This issue has been mentioned in trias-project/indicators#72, trias-project/indicators#106. SOlving it means solving them as well.

Image

@damianooldoni
Copy link
Collaborator Author

damianooldoni commented Jan 27, 2025

@soriadelva: is this something you would like to have solved already for the trend analysis of Wallonian protected areas?

@soriadelva
Copy link
Collaborator

@soriadelva: is this something you would like to have solved already for the trend analysis of Wallonian protected areas?

Ideally, yes. If you like, I can have a look at this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants