Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ARM64 version #371

Open
craigloewen-msft opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 7 comments
Open

ARM64 version #371

craigloewen-msft opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 7 comments

Comments

@craigloewen-msft
Copy link

Is your feature request about something that is currently impossible or hard to do? Please describe the problem.

Is it possible to add a dedicated ARM64 version of gVim for Windows?

Describe the solution you'd like

An arm64 architecture version of gVim for Windows to be shipped.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Right now gVim for Windows works on ARM but it's emulated. It would be great to get a native version.

Additional context

None.

@chrisbra
Copy link
Member

chrisbra commented Mar 4, 2025

It seems there is no Windows ARM64 image support available yet at Appveyor. And even it there was, it may take some time to tweak the build process. I don't have a machine to test this out.

@crutkas
Copy link

crutkas commented Mar 7, 2025

@chrisbra can you reach out to Craig and myself about that 2nd problem? [email protected]; [email protected]

@crutkas
Copy link

crutkas commented Mar 17, 2025

@chrisbra happy to send a device to you for testing.

For Appveyor Arm64, is this needed for unit tests or for building? Looks like it could do an Azure image which does have Windows on Arm. https://www.appveyor.com/docs/server/running-builds-on-azure/

@chrisbra
Copy link
Member

I did reach out to the mentioned two email addresses

@craigloewen-msft
Copy link
Author

Hi @chrisbra we didn't end up receiving that mail, could you send it again? Maybe try: [email protected]

@chrisbra
Copy link
Member

Tried again from my usual address (you can check the git commits). You should have received it. Thanks

@crutkas
Copy link

crutkas commented Mar 23, 2025

Got it and responding now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants