[css-flexbox-1] Should 'align-content: stretch' use 'safe' in the fallback value? #11641
Labels
Comments
|
I have a PR #11554 to fix the flexbox spec if this is just an error. |
<!DOCTYPE html>
<div style="display: inline-flex; border: solid; height: 50px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse; align-content: stretch">
<div style="width: 100px; height: 100px; background: cyan"></div>
</div>
<div style="display: inline-flex; border: solid; height: 50px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse; align-content: flex-start">
<div style="width: 100px; height: 100px; background: cyan"></div>
</div>
<div style="display: inline-flex; border: solid; height: 50px; flex-wrap: wrap-reverse; align-content: safe flex-start">
<div style="width: 100px; height: 100px; background: cyan"></div>
</div>Gecko, Blink and WebKit use |
|
Agenda+ to confirm with the CSSWG. |
|
(I think this is the right thing to do, just want to confirm that we want to do it.) |
|
Which one do you think is the right thing, safe or not? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Commit b6c01a4 makes
align-content: stretchfallback tosafe flex-startin css-flexbox-1 https://drafts.csswg.org/css-flexbox-1/#valdef-align-content-stretch, which is not consistent with the fallbackflex-startspecifying in css-align-3 https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align-3/#valdef-align-content-stretch.Is this an editorial error or intentional?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: