Mention of dissent in recommendation resolution is unclear #978
Labels
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Milestone
In section 6.3.9.3 the opening paragraph mentions Dissent:
The current phrasing implies AC reps can dissent on a Recommendation review without filing a formal objection, but in section 5.7.1 it's mentioned that "For clarity, in the context of an AC Review, dissent must be expressed as a Formal Objection."
The opening paragraph in 6.3.9.3 should be revised to clear this up. There wouldn't be publication if there was dissent until the Formal Objection is cleared.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: