-
@hardfist said: we need to do something about it, so I start this discussion. @web-infra-dev/rspack cc |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments
-
The feature currently can't work well with the default caching strategy of the Rspack dev server. Because the The feature also disable the Gzip of Rspack dev server, which also causes bad loading performance. I have a workaround for it, but I first want to know the suggestions of the team to decide if to apply the workaround. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
After discussing with @h-a-n-a, we think Thus, we should not consider removing it in the future rather than keep it as an experimental feature for a long time. We just need a better name for it and move it to the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
After discussing with @h-a-n-a, we think
builtins.noEmitAssets
is not a hacky feature. If there are no better solutions to achieve the same functionality,builtins.noEmitAssets
should be an experimental and necessary feature for the large-scale project.Thus, we should not consider removing it in the future rather than keep it as an experimental feature for a long time.
We just need a better name for it and move it to the
experiments
options. @hardfist cc