Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make explicit proposal about moving URL-LS into IETF #38

Open
masinter opened this issue Dec 28, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

make explicit proposal about moving URL-LS into IETF #38

masinter opened this issue Dec 28, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@masinter
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a possibility of turning URL-LS into an IETF RFC?

Publishing URL-LS content under an IETF RFC may be possible, but doing so wouldn't cause the the URL-LS effort to be abandoned, which would require evidence that the IETF spec is better maintained than the WHATWG effort. There is precedent for this, the WHATWG abandoned effort on a DOM related specification (events?) after it became clear that the W3C version was more actively maintained.

@rubys rubys added the IETF label Dec 29, 2014
@sideshowbarker
Copy link

There is precedent for this, the WHATWG abandoned effort on a DOM related specification (events?) after it became clear that the W3C version was more actively maintained.

That was the DOM Parsing and Serialization spec and "abandoned" isn't the right word to describe what occurred. Anyway, the URL spec is a very different case.

@rubys
Copy link
Member

rubys commented Dec 29, 2014

Thanks Mike! For the benefit of others, here's some relevant links:

https://github.com/whatwg/domparsing
http://domparsing.spec.whatwg.org/

And, yes, the URL spec is a very unique case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants