Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update lobehub/lobe-chat docker tag to v1.70.5 #3412

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 12, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 11, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Update Change
lobehub/lobe-chat patch 1.70.2 -> 1.70.5

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Release Notes

lobehub/lobe-chat (lobehub/lobe-chat)

v1.70.5

Compare Source

Released on 2025-03-11

🐛 Bug Fixes
  • misc: Refactor the theme implement.

Improvements and Fixes
What's fixed


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Never, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Mar 11, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
services:
lobe-chat:
image: lobehub/lobe-chat:1.70.2
image: lobehub/lobe-chat:1.70.5
container_name: ${CONTAINER_NAME}
restart: always
networks:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The provided code snippet looks mostly correct and does not appear to contain any major issues. However, there is one change that might need consideration:

The update from 1.70.2 to 1.70.5 means that the container image version has been updated. This could imply that new features, improvements, or bug fixes have been introduced in 1.70.5. It's generally a good practice to ensure compatibility with existing configurations.

Here’s something you might want to consider:

  1. Compatibility Checks: If this update involves significant changes, you may want to review any custom scripts that interact directly with the LobeChat API or modify the service configuration. Ensure these remain compatible with the newer version.

  2. Documentation Review: Check if there are any documentation updates or known breaking changes related to the latest release of LobeChat. Understanding these can help prevent unexpected behavior in your application.

  3. Testing Environment: Set up a testing environment using the new docker image (e.g., locally). Test the deployment process and ensure everything continues to function correctly.

Overall, the code appears straightforward and unlikely to introduce significant problems. Minor adjustments based on new versions might be necessary but are expected with every minor revision.

@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud merged commit e855bbb into dev Mar 12, 2025
1 check was pending
@wanghe-fit2cloud wanghe-fit2cloud deleted the renovate/lobehub-lobe-chat-1.x branch March 12, 2025 06:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant