-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
#issue-66 #82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
#issue-66 #82
Conversation
WalkthroughThe updates include changes to backend authentication error messages for more user-friendly responses, the addition of a new frontend dependency, and the implementation of client-side validation for the login form. Other authentication forms received formatting and consistency improvements, but no major logic changes. Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
frontend/src/Pages/Authentication/forms.tsx (2)
36-43: Password validation could be improved.While the basic length check is a good start, consider strengthening password validation to encourage more secure passwords.
const validatePassword = (password: string) => { - if (password.length < 8) { - setPasswordError("Password must be at least 8 characters"); - return false; - } + const hasMinLength = password.length >= 8; + const hasUpperCase = /[A-Z]/.test(password); + const hasLowerCase = /[a-z]/.test(password); + const hasNumbers = /[0-9]/.test(password); + const hasSpecialChar = /[^A-Za-z0-9]/.test(password); + + if (!hasMinLength) { + setPasswordError("Password must be at least 8 characters"); + return false; + } else if (!(hasUpperCase && hasLowerCase && hasNumbers)) { + setPasswordError("Password must contain uppercase, lowercase, and numbers"); + return false; + } setPasswordError(""); return true; };
61-64: Good inline validation approach.Running validation as the user types provides immediate feedback, which is good UX. Consider debouncing for better performance on slower devices.
onChange={(e) => { setEmail(e.target.value); - validateEmail(e.target.value); + // Only validate after user stops typing for a moment + clearTimeout(emailValidationTimer.current); + emailValidationTimer.current = setTimeout(() => { + validateEmail(e.target.value); + }, 300); }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
backend/controllers/auth.go(4 hunks)frontend/package.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/Pages/Authentication/forms.tsx(8 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
backend/controllers/auth.go (6)
26-26: Improved user-facing error message.Replacing the raw error message with a more user-friendly message is a good practice for better UX.
32-32: Good abstraction of technical details.Hiding AWS Cognito-specific error details from the end user improves security by not exposing implementation details.
68-68: Enhanced error guidance for login.The more detailed error message with actionable guidance helps users understand what they need to fix.
74-74: Improved authentication error message.The updated message is more user-friendly and provides clear instructions without exposing backend implementation details.
89-89: Consistent error message formatting.Good job maintaining consistency in error message phrasing across different authentication endpoints.
95-95: User-friendly error handling.The simplified message properly hides implementation details while providing clear next steps to the user.
frontend/src/Pages/Authentication/forms.tsx (7)
17-19: Good addition of validation state variables.Adding dedicated state variables for form validation errors is a clean approach to managing form validation state.
26-34: Effective email validation implementation.The email validation using a regular expression pattern is a standard approach. The regex pattern correctly checks for the basic email format requirements.
67-67: Good error message display.Showing validation errors inline below the relevant input fields follows best practices for form design.
72-75: Consistent validation patterns.Following the same validation pattern for password as for email maintains consistency in the codebase.
78-80: Proper visual feedback for validation errors.The styling of error messages with red text makes them stand out appropriately to users.
81-90: Improved password visibility toggle UI.The restructured password visibility toggle with improved layout provides better user experience.
162-171: Consistent UI patterns across forms.Using the same pattern for password visibility toggle across different forms maintains UI consistency.
|
is anyone reviewing this? |
fix: improved regex for error messages and updated input validation for login and signup forms
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores