Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
106 changes: 106 additions & 0 deletions adr/0021-separate-artifact-identity-from-registry-coordinates.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
# ADR-0021: Separate Artifact Identity from Registry Coordinates

**Status:** Proposed

**Date:** 2026-08-26

**Related:** [Issue #102](https://github.com/Agent-Card/ai-catalog/issues/102)

**Supersedes if accepted:** The federated AIR requirement in
[ADR-0015](0015-agent-identifier-naming.md)

## Context

Existing registries commonly identify artifacts with native coordinates,
such as a registry namespace and artifact name. When projecting those
records as AI Catalog entries, the catalog operator may have no
publisher-assigned `urn:air` identifier.

Using the registry's domain in `urn:air` is easy, but the current format
defines that domain as the artifact publisher. Requiring the publisher's
domain is portable, but prevents automatic projection when the publisher
has not supplied or authorized an identifier.

The existing model already separates most roles: `publisher` identifies
the artifact publisher, `host` identifies the catalog operator, `url`
locates the artifact, and `extensions` can preserve registry-specific
coordinates.

## Decision

`entry.identifier` identifies the artifact represented by the entry and
remains stable across versions. A publisher-authorized `urn:air`
identifier is also portable across catalog locations. Other
identifier schemes remain valid but have no cross-catalog portability
guarantee. Consumers that do not recognize an identifier scheme treat
the value as opaque. Identifier syntax alone does not verify publisher
identity or establish trust.

The base format does not require a particular identifier scheme. A
globally unique absolute URI is recommended for open or federated use.
An artifact publisher that wants an identifier to be preserved when the
artifact appears in other catalogs should use the AI Catalog-specific
`urn:air` format in a namespace it controls.

A publisher-authorized `urn:air` identifier is one assigned by the
artifact publisher or its authorized delegate, with the artifact
publisher's domain in the `{publisher}` segment.

Catalog projection creates a Catalog Entry from either a source Catalog
Entry in another AI Catalog or a source record in another system. When
incorporating a projected entry for the first time, a catalog operator
selects its identifier by applying these rules in order:

1. If the source contains a publisher-authorized `urn:air` identifier,
preserve it exactly.
2. Otherwise, the operator may preserve a non-`urn:air` source identifier
or replace it. Non-`urn:air` identifiers have no guaranteed portability
across catalogs.
3. When assigning a new identifier, an operator that becomes the artifact
publisher should use `urn:air` with its own domain in the `{publisher}`
segment. An operator acting as an authorized delegate should use
`urn:air` with the delegating publisher's domain in that segment. An
operator that is neither the artifact publisher nor its authorized
delegate must use a non-`urn:air` identifier under its own control.

Operating a catalog or aggregating an entry does not make its operator the
artifact publisher.

Changing a previously published primary identifier requires an explicit
migration mechanism, which this decision does not define.

The catalog operator and artifact publisher are distinct roles. An
operator-assigned identifier does not imply that the operator published
the artifact.

A catalog operator may retain replaced source identifiers or source-system
coordinates. When retained, they should be stored in a namespaced entry
extension. They do not affect catalog uniqueness or establish publisher
identity, trust, or equivalence with another identifier.

## Consequences

- Publisher-authorized `urn:air` identifiers are preserved across
catalogs and mirrors.
- Non-`urn:air` identifiers remain valid, but catalog operators may preserve
or replace them.
- Legacy records can be projected without publisher enrollment by using
an operator-assigned identifier.
- Two catalog operators may assign different identifiers to the same
artifact when no publisher-authorized `urn:air` identity is available.
The model does not claim equivalence it cannot establish.
- No new core field is added; source-system coordinates use `extensions`.
- Generic aliases and primary-identifier migration remain future work.

## Alternatives Considered

Always using a registry-domain `urn:air` was rejected because it makes the
registry appear to be the artifact publisher under the current format.

Requiring a publisher-domain `urn:air` was rejected as a universal rule
because it makes automatic projection depend on publisher enrollment.

Adding `aliases`, `nativeIdentifier`, or `identifiers[]` was deferred
because source-system coordinates do not necessarily assert logical
identity equivalence, and `extensions` is sufficient for the immediate
use case.
79 changes: 73 additions & 6 deletions specification/ai-catalog.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -203,9 +203,9 @@ A Catalog Entry object describes a single AI artifact in the catalog.
It MUST contain the following members:

`identifier`
: A string uniquely identifying this artifact. This field is an open text format (e.g., any valid URI or URN is accepted). However, to ensure interoperability, identity uniqueness, and discoverability, the standard `urn:air` naming structure is **HIGHLY RECOMMENDED** and **MUST** be used for open or federated systems.
: A string uniquely identifying this artifact. This field is an open text format (e.g., any valid URI or URN is accepted). Consumers that do not recognize an identifier scheme MUST treat the value as opaque. Identifier syntax alone does not verify publisher identity or establish trust. For open or federated systems, a globally unique absolute URI is RECOMMENDED. An artifact publisher that wants an entry identifier to be preserved when the artifact appears in other catalogs SHOULD use the AI Catalog-specific `urn:air` naming structure with its own domain in the `{publisher}` segment. A catalog operator incorporating an entry for the first time with a publisher-authorized `urn:air` identifier MUST preserve that identifier exactly.

**Standard Naming Format:**
**`urn:air` Identifier Format:**
`urn:air:{publisher}:{namespace}:{name}`

- `{publisher}`: The domain name of the organization publishing the artifact (e.g., `example.com`).
Expand All @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ It MUST contain the following members:

For closed or local systems where a different identifier format is used, client implementations are responsible for parsing and processing the custom format as appropriate.

See [Multi-Version Entries](#multi-version-entries) for uniqueness rules when multiple versions are present.
See [Multi-Version Entries](#multi-version-entries) for uniqueness rules when multiple versions are present, and [Catalog Projection](#catalog-projection) for identifiers assigned while projecting an existing Catalog Entry or source-system record.

`type`
: A string containing the identifier that specifies the type of the
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -433,9 +433,9 @@ single artifact — similar to a package registry.

When `version` is present, the combination of `identifier` and `version`
MUST be unique within the catalog. When `version` is absent, `identifier`
alone MUST be unique. The `identifier` SHOULD be stable across versions
and catalog locations so that the same logical artifact can be
recognized wherever it appears.
alone MUST be unique. The `identifier` SHOULD be stable across versions.
Only publisher-authorized `urn:air` identifiers receive a cross-catalog
preservation requirement, as defined in [Catalog Projection](#catalog-projection).

Clients that need only the latest version SHOULD sort entries
sharing the same `identifier` by `version` (when parseable as a semantic
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -469,6 +469,73 @@ For example, a catalog listing two versions of the same agent:
Both entries share the same `identifier` but have distinct `version`
values, so the combination is unique.

## Catalog Projection

A publisher-authorized `urn:air` identifier is one assigned by the
artifact publisher or its authorized delegate, with the artifact
publisher's domain in the `{publisher}` segment.

Catalog projection creates a Catalog Entry from either a source Catalog
Entry in another AI Catalog or a source record in another system. When
incorporating a projected entry for the first time, a catalog operator
MUST select its identifier by applying these rules in order:

1. If the source contains a publisher-authorized `urn:air` identifier,
the operator MUST preserve it exactly.
2. Otherwise, the operator MAY preserve a non-`urn:air` source identifier
or replace it. Non-`urn:air` identifiers have no guaranteed portability
across catalogs.
3. When assigning a new identifier, an operator that becomes the artifact
publisher SHOULD use `urn:air` with its own domain in the `{publisher}`
segment. An operator acting as an authorized delegate SHOULD use
`urn:air` with the delegating publisher's domain in that segment. An
operator that is neither the artifact publisher nor its authorized

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It would be helpful to note how publisher delegate/operator-assigned identifiers interact with the trust domain validation requirements in section 5.1.

Specifically:

When a Trust Manifest appears within a Catalog Entry, the identity field's trust domain MUST align with the publisher domain in the containing entry's identifier field

When an operator assigns a urn:air, it must still satisfy this domain alignment w/ trustManifest.identity.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added a commit with a clarifying sentence:

A projected entry that uses urn:air and includes a Trust Manifest remains subject to the trust-domain alignment requirements in Identity.

That keeps the normative requirements delegated to the Identity section.

delegate MUST use a non-`urn:air` identifier under its own control.

A projected entry that uses `urn:air` and includes a Trust Manifest remains
subject to the trust-domain alignment requirements in [Identity](#identity).

Operating a catalog or aggregating an entry does not make its operator the
artifact publisher. A catalog operator MUST NOT infer publisher
authorization from the artifact's URL or an unsigned `publisher` field.

Adopting a different primary identifier after publication requires an
explicit migration mechanism, which this specification does not define.

An identifier assigned by a catalog operator identifies the artifact, not
a particular version or source record. It MUST remain stable across
versions, source-coordinate changes, and retrieval-URL changes, and MUST
NOT be reassigned to another artifact. The catalog operator and artifact
publisher are distinct roles. The operator is the entity identified by the
top-level `host` field when that field is present.

A catalog operator MAY retain replaced source identifiers or source-system
coordinates. If retained, they SHOULD be stored in a namespaced entry
extension. They do not participate in catalog uniqueness or establish
publisher identity, trust, or equivalence with another identifier.

```json
{
"identifier": "https://registry.example/ids/artifacts/7bf4a8c2",
"type": "application/a2a-agent-card+json",
"url": "https://registry.example/apis/registry/v3/groups/payments/artifacts/fraud-agent",
"publisher": {
"identifier": "did:web:acme.example",
"displayName": "Acme"
},
"extensions": {
"com.example.registry.coordinates": {
"registryUri": "https://registry.example",
"sourceIdentifier": "foo",
"namespace": "payments",
"name": "fraud-agent"
}
}
}
```

The extension key is illustrative.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As we're aware that AI catalog is designed for federation, do you think it makes sense to formalise a native/official extension for federation source / entry origin?

This could then be used to build chain of origin if someone wants to find the normative source of a entry, e.g. resolve the entry origin then check that entries origin until you find an entry with no origin.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I pushed a commit to address the other comments, but I think this comment should be addressed in a separate PR if we want to pursue it.


## Publisher Object

The Publisher object identifies the entity responsible for an artifact.
Expand Down
Loading