Feature/inverting persistence dependency #3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As per #2
Summary of changes:
IApplicationDbContextandIDealSetinterfacesA couple of notes
IApplicationDbContextandIDealSetinterfaces could be combined into one port, but I'd prefer to make iterative steps, just to demonstrate the dependency inversion of the current implementation.I've changed DealDomain from using Generic('T') to specific
Dealclass, because IMHO, 'Deal' is what DealDomain should be interested in, right? The new Port above can be also implemented by using Generics, but need to change the unit tests first, and tidy up the code before that step, which is out of the scope. As I mentioned before this PR is for reversing dependency demo.